skip to main | skip to sidebar

AboveCapricorn

Above Capricorn Technologies - agricultural and environmental consultants /managers focussing on agriculture, horticulture, turf, sportsturf, livestock, land and land rehabilitation, erosion management, bioremediation, phytoremediation, water/wastewater and waste management [especially organics] in the tropics

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Poor Sanitation A Child Killer in India


Poor Sanitation in India May Afflict Well-Fed Children With Malnutrition







    12 Photos


    SHEOHAR DISTRICT, India — He wore thick black eyeliner to ward off the evil eye, but Vivek, a tiny 1-year-old living in a village of mud huts and diminutive people, had nonetheless fallen victim to India’s great scourge of malnutrition.

    His parents seemed to be doing all the right things. His mother still breast-fed him. His family had six goats, access to fresh buffalo milk and a hut filled with hundreds of pounds of wheat and potatoes. The economy of the state where he lives has for years grown faster than almost any other. His mother said she fed him as much as he would eat and took him four times to doctors, who diagnosed malnutrition. Just before Vivek was born in this green landscape of small plots and grazing water buffalo near the Nepali border, the family even got electricity.
    So why was Vivek malnourished?


    It is a question being asked about children across India, where a long economic boom has done little to reduce the vast number of children who are malnourished and stunted, leaving them with mental and physical deficits that will haunt them their entire lives. Now, an emerging body of scientific studies suggest that Vivek and many of the 162 million other children under the age of 5 in the world who are malnourished are suffering less a lack of food than poor sanitation.

    Poor Sanitation Linked to Malnutrition in India

    New research on malnutrition, which leads to childhood stunting, suggests that a root cause may be an abundance of human waste polluting soil and water, rather than a scarcity of food.





    Afghanistan
    60%
    Percentage of children under 5 who are stunted
    50
    Ethiopia
    India
    India
    Pakistan
    40
    Nepal
    Nigeria
    Uganda
    30
    Togo
    Ghana
    Haiti
    20
    Senegal
    10
    Number of people who defecate outdoors
    per square kilometer
    0
    0
    50
    100
    150
    Sources: Demographic and Health Surveys, USAID (stunting data, latest year available); World Health Organization, Unicef (defecation data, 2012)

    Like almost everyone else in their village, Vivek and his family have no toilet, and the district where they live has the highest concentration of people who defecate outdoors. As a result, children are exposed to a bacterial brew that often sickens them, leaving them unable to attain a healthy body weight no matter how much food they eat.
    “These children’s bodies divert energy and nutrients away from growth and brain development to prioritize infection-fighting survival,” said Jean Humphrey, a professor of human nutrition at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “When this happens during the first two years of life, children become stunted. What’s particularly disturbing is that the lost height and intelligence are permanent.”
    Two years ago, Unicef, the World Health Organization and the World Bank released a major report on child malnutrition that focused entirely on a lack of food. Sanitation was not mentioned. Now, Unicef officials and those from other major charitable organizations said in interviews that they believe that poor sanitation may cause more than half of the world’s stunting problems.
    “Our realization about the connection between stunting and sanitation is just emerging,” said Sue Coates, chief of water, sanitation and hygiene at Unicef India. “At this point, it is still just an hypothesis, but it is an incredibly exciting and important one because of its potential impact.”
    This research has quietly swept through many of the world’s nutrition and donor organizations in part because it resolves a great mystery: Why are Indian children so much more malnourished than their poorer counterparts in sub-Saharan Africa?

    A child raised in India is far more likely to be malnourished than one from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Zimbabwe or Somalia, the planet’s poorest countries. Stunting affects 65 million Indian children under the age of 5, including a third of children from the country’s richest families.
    This disconnect between wealth and malnutrition is so striking that economists have concluded that economic growth does almost nothing to reduce malnutrition.

    Half of India’s population, or at least 620 million people, defecate outdoors. And while this share has declined slightly in the past decade, an analysis of census data shows that rapid population growth has meant that most Indians are being exposed to more human waste than ever before.
    In Sheohar, for instance, a toilet-building program between 2001 and 2011 decreased the share of households without toilets to 80 percent from 87 percent, but population growth meant that exposure to human waste rose by half.

    “The difference in average height between Indian and African children can be explained entirely by differing concentrations of open defecation,” said Dean Spears, an economist at the Delhi School of Economics. “There are far more people defecating outside in India more closely to one another’s children and homes than there are in Africa or anywhere else in the world.”


    Not only does stunting contribute to the deaths of a million children under the age of 5 each year, but those who survive suffer cognitive deficits and are poorer and sicker than children not affected by stunting. They also may face increased risks for adult illnesses like diabetes, heart attacks and strokes.

    “India’s stunting problem represents the largest loss of human potential in any country in history, and it affects 20 times more people in India alone than H.I.V./AIDS does around the world,” said Ramanan Laxminarayan, vice president for research and policy at the Public Health Foundation of India.

    India is an increasingly risky place to raise children. The country’s sanitation and air quality are among the worst in the world. Parasitic diseases and infections like tuberculosis, often linked with poor sanitation, are most common in India. More than one in four newborn deaths occur in India.
    Open defecation has long been an issue in India. Some ancient Hindu texts advised people to relieve themselves far from home, a practice that Gandhi sought to curb.
    “The cause of many of our diseases is the condition of our lavatories and our bad habit of disposing of excreta anywhere and everywhere,” Gandhi wrote in 1925.
    Other developing countries have made huge strides in improving sanitation. Just 1 percent of Chinese and 3 percent of Bangladeshis relieve themselves outside compared with half of Indians. Attitudes may be just as important as access to toilets. Constructing and maintaining tens of millions of toilets in India would cost untold billions, a price many voters see no need to pay — a recent survey found that many people prefer going to the bathroom outside.
    Few rural households build the sort of inexpensive latrines that have all but eliminated outdoor waste in neighboring Bangladesh.
    One analysis found that government spending on toilets pays for itself in increased tax receipts from greater productivity, but the math works only if every member of a family who gets a toilet uses it.

    “We need a cultural revolution in this country to completely change people’s attitudes toward sanitation and hygiene,” said Jairam Ramesh, an economist and former sanitation minister.
    Continue reading the main story

    India’s government has for decades tried to resolve the country’s stubborn malnutrition problems by distributing vast stores of subsidized food. But more and better food has largely failed to reverse early stunting, studies have repeatedly shown.

    India now spends about $26 billion annually on food and jobs programs, and less than $400 million on improving sanitation — a ratio of more than 60 to 1.



    “We need to reverse that ratio entirely,” Dr. Laxminarayan said.

    Studies are underway in Bangladesh, Kenya and Zimbabwe to assess the share of stunting attributable to poor sanitation. “Is it 50 percent? Ninety percent? That’s a question worth answering,” said Dr. Stephen Luby, a professor of medicine at Stanford University who is overseeing a trial in Bangladesh that is expected to report its results in 2016. “In the meantime, I think we can all agree that it’s not a good idea to raise children surrounded by poop.”


    Better sanitation in the West during the 19th and early 20th centuries led to huge improvements in health long before the advent of vaccines and antibiotics, and researchers have long known that childhood environments play a crucial role in child death and adult height.
    The present research on gut diseases in children has focused on a condition resulting from repeated bacterial infections that flatten intestinal linings, reducing by a third the ability to absorb nutrients. A recent study of starving children found that they lacked the crucial gut bacteria needed to digest food.

    In a little-discussed but surprising finding, Muslim children in India are 17 percent more likely to survive infancy than Hindus, even though Muslims are generally poorer and less educated. This enormous difference in infant mortality is explained by the fact that Muslims are far more likely to use latrines and live next to others also using latrines, a recent analysis found.
    So widespread housing discrimination that confines many Muslims to separate slums may protect their children from increased exposure to the higher levels of waste in Hindu communities and, as a result, save thousands of Indian Muslim babies from death each year.
    Just building more toilets, however, may not be enough to save India’s children.
    Phool Mati lives in a neighborhood in Varanasi with 12 public toilets, but her 1-year-old grandson, Sandeep, is nonetheless severely malnourished. His mother tries to feed him lentils, milk and other foods as often as she can, but Sandeep is rarely hungry because he is so often sick, Ms. Mati said.

    The effluent pipe that served the bathroom building is often clogged. Raw sewage seeps into an adjoining Hindu temple, and, during the monsoon season, it flooded the neighborhood’s homes. The matron of the toilet facility charges two rupees for each use, so most children relieve themselves directly into open drains that run along a central walkway.

    No Indian city has a comprehensive waste treatment system, and most Indian rivers are open sewers as a result. But Varanasi, India’s oldest and holiest city, is so awash in human waste that its decrepit condition became a national issue in recent elections. The city’s sewage plants can handle only about 20 percent of the sewage generated in the city, said Ramesh Chopra of Ganga Seva Abhiyanam, a trust for cleaning the river. The rest sloshes into the Ganges or fetid ponds and pits.


    Millions of pilgrims bathe in the Ganges along Varanasi’s ancient riverfront, but a stream of human waste — nearly 75 million liters per day — flows directly into the river just above the bathing ghats, steps leading down to the river. Many people wash or brush their teeth beside smaller sewage outlets.

    Much of the city’s drinking water comes from the river, and half of Indian households drink from contaminated supplies.  “India’s problems are bigger than just open defecation and a lack of toilets,” Dr. Laxminarayan said.



    Suhasini Raj contributed reporting.

    A version of this article appears in print on July 15, 2014, on page A1 of the NY Times New York edition with the headline: Malnutrition in Well-Fed Children Is Linked to Poor Sanitation .
    Posted by surfie999@gmail.com at 00:30 No comments:
    Labels: sanitation

    Tuesday, July 15, 2014

    Repealing the Carbon Text May Kill the Very Successful Fire Abatement Programs in North Australia

    The West Arnhem Fire Abatement program that reduces greenhouse gas emissions is at risk if carbon pricing is removed. This program is run through the Northern Land Council.

    Details are here -http://www.nailsma.org.au/walfa-west-arnhem-land-fire-abatement-project  

    In the NT this program sells greenhouse gas credits to LNG company Conoco Phillips in Darwin and has had plans for expansion.

    Once the carbon tax goes, these programs are potentially likely to fall over, with this one and others in the Kimberley area at risk.

    The following press release also has more to say.

    Killing the carbon price will hurt Indigenous communities

    July 14, 2014

    Today the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) publicly supports the Kimberley Land Council, who on Friday reported that Indigenous communities stood to lose millions if the carbon price is repealed. 
    “As the Prime Minister does deals with cross-bench senators this week, Indigenous communities throughout Australia are watching on in dread. Removing the ‘carbon tax’ will seriously threaten future prosperity,” said Wade Freeman, Kimberly project officer with ACF. 

    The hugely successful Indigenous Rangers Program, and their work in fire management, is one area that is at risk.  “Well-planned prescribed fires have not only prevented dangerous wildfires, but have cut greenhouse pollution entering the atmosphere. Through the Carbon Farming Initiative, these are a key source of income for Indigenous communities.  “So far, the fire management activities have generated 230,000 credits estimated to be worth about $5 million based on the current carbon price,” Mr Freeman said.

    “Unfortunately, the government’s own Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF) will make things harder for Indigenous communities.  “Indigenous Ranger groups and communities will be pushed out of the market if the Abbott governments "reverse auction" in the ERF model is adopted. The ERF effectively has sellers competing to generate the lowest price on carbon as opposed to the current arrangement where large polluting companies compete against each other to buy credits.  "If Tony Abbott is really the Prime Minister for Indigenous Peoples, he need to find the missing link between a great initiative for Indigenous people and managing Australia’s pollution levels, and the ERF isn’t it," Mr Freeman said. 

    “Earning income from carbon farming by managing country is important to the plans of remote Indigenous communities to participate in long term economic activity, rather than rely on welfare support,” Mr Freeman said.


    The Law of Unintended Consequences strikes again??   
    Posted by surfie999@gmail.com at 11:00 No comments:
    Labels: carbon emissions, carbon tax, Emissions trading

    Monday, July 14, 2014

    Could Fodder Exports Come from Northern Australia?

    There has been increasing production of fodder for export derived from near Perth, Victoria and even South Australia.  There is also some from central NSW with potential for some development in southern Queensland.

    While the USA has had a major role in this trade, many of the export markets are somewhat keen to diversify suppliers to avoid longer term supply issues, and provide options for growth.  Certainly the market seems to be destined for future growth to supply feed for the dairy cow industry in Asia, as Asian economies actively consume additional dairy products, often as quality fresh milk, produced locally.

    This is driven by lucerne and oaten hay as primary crops going into the export market.

    Principally these countries have been Japan, South Korea and more recently China. The article below provides some more detail on the current trade - http://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/news/agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/hay-market-eyes-china-growth/2704546.aspx?storypage=0 

    But what is the possibility for northern Australia being able to obtain some of this market?

    While lucerne and oaten hay are seen as annual crops and may be the ideal for dairy cows [ and there is a lot of mystique about why they are used over others], is there a place for some of the feed crops that go into the cubes and hay used for the live export trade?  This is especially true if you consider the experience now available around the northern areas of Australia in producing these materials for what is a very substantial live export market of around three quarters to one million head per year leaving the region annually.

    Quality may be an issue, but that can be adjusted relatively easily as the legume / grass mix is adjusted to suit.

    The region can definitely grow fodder, and do it more easily than grain or seed, in the wet season, as well as irrigated crops into the dry season.

    Shipping may be a constraint - but can be overcome.

    Can north Australia join this trade and bring benefit to the region?
    Posted by surfie999@gmail.com at 12:01 No comments:
    Labels: China, export fodder, fodder crops

    Thursday, July 03, 2014

    Why Rush to Repeal Australia's Carbon Laws?

    In an op-ed piece published today John Connor of the Climate Institute makes the plea to not rush and repeal Australia's climate management laws.

    Full text is here - http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-02/connor-dont-rush-to-repeal-our-effective-carbon-laws/5561638

    I somehow think this will fall on deaf ears.......but it is a reasonable proposition!

    As he points out, they are actually working.  And the broad swath of society is now more comfortable with the system.  Yes, energy intensive industries - think aluminium smelting - is suffering, but there are also other factors at work here including overall issues about metal demand and labour costs.  Maybe further measures are warranted if it is worthwhile saving.

    I have no doubt that if repealed consumers will not get back the so called additional costs incurred because of a carbon tax - we will get diddled - absolutely sure to happen.  And already some commentators are saying maybe only 50% reduction of current energy costs from law repeal.

    Australia is progressing well with distributed solar PV rollout around the country, adding to more low carbon energy production.  Fossil fuel generation of power is down, but that is associated with lower demand generally, and a small contribution from distributed power production [ local PV, hydro, wind etc] as well as a better focus on energy efficiency in buildings and similar areas.  These latter changes are still ongoing and offer much more options for reducing energy consumption in buildings especially - a major user of energy. Industry is also reducing water use - and in water there are considerable energy costs associated with distribution and use of that water.  More can be done, I am sure, in these areas.

    There is more coming too, as manufacturers are forced or voluntarily, adjust processes to have more efficient appliances eg recent new appliance and air conditioner energy standards in the US and Australia., and as way of example, less energy consumption in newer TV sets.

    The real issue may be not their repeal...........but whether there are the numbers to do so in Parliament, whatever!

    It will be interesting.  

    And - I agree, it is sensible to leave them alone at least for a while as they are working -  and much of the rhetoric coming from the Australian government is muddying the issue - many countries and regions we trade with  are developing systems similar to what we have already.  Why change now?
    Posted by surfie999@gmail.com at 16:56 No comments:
    Labels: Australia, climate change, climate policy, energy efficiency, policy, renewable energy, solar energy

    Wednesday, July 02, 2014

    Recycling Water Crucial To NT Water Supplies

    In the face of global water supply shortages, recycled water has the potential to help us be more climate-independent. And even though it seems novel, reused water is already cycled back into the supply. If you live in a community downstream of another one, chances are, you are reusing its water.
    Australians and Americans have embraced “sustainability” in so many aspects of modern life, but not when it comes to water resources.

    Recycled or reclaimed water is water that is used more than one time before it passes back into the natural water cycle. Treated wastewater, including sewage and water used for industrial processing, can be cleanly recycled for agricultural and landscape irrigation, industrial processes, toilet flushing, replenishing a groundwater basin and even for drinking water.

    Scientifically proven advances in water technology — including reverse osmosis, ultraviolet disinfection, and oxidation — applied to wastewater allow communities to reuse water for many different purposes, treating the water differently depending on the intended use.

    And the best part is: there is huge potential for growth in using recycled water. Thirty-two billion gallons of municipal wastewater are produced everyday in the United States but less than 10 percent of that is intentionally reused and the equation is quite similar in the Northern Territory, particularly in the northern areas, as Alice Springs now does have an aquifer recharge program using treated wastewater from the effluent ponds.  

    Also, it is known that the NT uses up to four times water per person more than temperate Australia, and much of that extra water is used outside, where non potable water would do.  It is certainly wasteful to treat all water to drinking standards and then use 70% outside as is common in Darwin.

    One key reason that water reuse is not a bigger part of the nation’s water supply is that it is still characterized as a waste product in most places. 

    In a progressive move, California in the US recently enacted legislation that reclassifies recycled water as a water resource. The state government also recently streamlined the permitting process for using recycled water for irrigation and allocated $200 million in grants to encourage related projects.  While California uses different legislative systems to Australia, the truth is, Australia could do a lot ore with use of appropriately treated wastewater.  AND......such programs would be sensible infrastructure development in a continent as dry as ours.

    In other parts of the USA,communities in dry west Texas have used state-of-the-art technology to augment their drinking water supply with reused water; Phoenix in Arizona has had an aquifer recharge program using treated effluent which is subsequently redrawn for use, for about 50 years; the governor of Oklahoma just signed a law to encourage water reuse; and Florida’s most recent water reuse report indicated that 719 million gallons of water is beneficially reused each day in 2013 — the largest amount in the country.  Yet here in north Australia as we discuss developing the north, there is little discussion about reuse of water, in an environment which is totally dry for 6-8 months each year, while in the other few months water flows away freely [ admittedly it is used by the environment!].

    The amount of water intentionally reused in both Australia and the USA still quite low and it will stay that way as long as the public regards reuse as an emergency measure. Citizens have embraced “sustainability” in so many aspects of modern life, but not when it comes to water resources.

    Conservation cannot meet future water demands alone and other measures that create new sources of water, like desalination, are still more expensive, with some people believing that it is too expensive although newer technologies are encouraging in possibly lower costs.  Desalination has its advocates though, with WA a champion of the technology, with development being driven by the woman who is the Chair of the WA Water Corporation.

    In the Top End of the NT the only avenue seemingly being explored for more water is to develop more dams or other above ground storage systems, such as the pumped off river system discussed for an area in hills north of Adelaide River, and the dam above Adelaide River.  Desalination of seawater is also a possible option around Darwin. 

    Water reuse is the easiest and most economical fix. It should be included in the water supply portfolio of the Darwin region, and in fact for all  communities.  It at least should be given equal weight in assessing future water resources for the region.

    [ partially adapted from an article by Melissa Melker of the US Water Reuse Association in the NY Times 30 June 2014]
    UPDATE - http://ecowatch.com/2014/03/20/solar-technology-californias-water/
    This is a solar technology to distill irrigation tailwater from agriculture fields using solar technology to heat a oil filled tube and then use the heat to distill the tailwater.  It works and can be scaled up, with a projected cost of about one quarter the cost of desalination of sea water [ many places say a cost for this of $2 per kilolitre].  Search for Water FX online for more details.

    Join Room for Debate on Facebook and follow updates on twitter.com/roomfordebate. 
    Posted by surfie999@gmail.com at 17:03 No comments:
    Labels: Darwin, desalinination, rainwater harvesting, stormwater, wastewater, water, water reuse, water treatment

    Tuesday, July 01, 2014

    Arsenic in Water - NO Safe Level for Drinking?

    The issues of arsenic in groundwater, especially used for drinking, is well known for areas of Asia.  This is particularly serious in Bangladesh, and also of concern in some areas of India and Thailand.  It is also known to occur in many other areas including Indonesia, Australia and ....... the USA.

    Up to at least around the year 2000, arsenic levels in drinking water considered safe, especially from groundwater sources were highly variable.  Again Bangladesh was among the most problematic, as some whole regional areas mostly seemed to show groundwater wells were commonly unsafe - even with nominally quite high "safe" levels of arsenic - 100 ppb or more. [ should be much lower]  

    In early 2000 the US reduced the safe level from 50 ppb to 5 ppb, which was subsequently raised to 10ppb [0.010 mg/L] which became the new standard in 2001, allowing a few years for compliance, and which could be enforced by 2006.
    http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/arsenic/regulations.cfm 

    It did not apply to smaller individual wells or bores however, only public utilities.  

    In Australia the level was set at 7 ppb [0.007 mg/L] in the 2004 Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, and with which public authorities must comply .

    Mostly, bores and wells did not get tested unless arsenic was suspected.

    Recent evidence seems to indicate that possibly there is no allowable level for arsenic in drinking water.  It should be zero.......not present in drinking water.

    More information is here in this recent report.  
    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/politics-derail-science-on-arsenic-endangering-public-health/?&WT.mc_id=SA_SP_20140630

    It seems it could be a bigger and more important issue than the presence of lead, an issue of some considerable concern in those areas where lead is mined or refined, and was previously of more widespread concern over lead in both paint and fuel.  Lead poisoning is potentially life threatening for young children......as may arsenic.

    Take care if you are using well or groundwater from a bore as many rural properties do - it should be very low in arsenic, preferably free of the metal.  If any hint of a problem, or in a region with known problems - get it tested.  

    Avoid arsenic in drinking water. 
    Posted by surfie999@gmail.com at 13:14 No comments:
    Labels: arsenic, water

    Friday, June 27, 2014

    Australian PV Systems - World Leader on Residential Installation Costs: Lessons For USA

    In 2013, the United States installed more solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity than either Germany or Australia for the first time ever. (the U.S. has triple their combined population, so arguably this should have happened long ago…). 

    With the decline of feed-in tariffs and other incentives in Germany, it is likely that the U.S. will continue to outpace that country in new PV installations. However, the U.S. continues to lag behind global PV leaders Germany and Australia in another important category: prices for residential systems installations. As of Q2 2013, the average installed residential system price was $4.93/W compared to Germany’s $2.21/W and Australia’s $2.56/W. That needs to change.

    Whether you look at U.S. DOE SunShot targets or RMI’s own Reinventing Fire vision, which has the U.S. solar market scaling from 4.5 GW PV installed per year to 20 GW, system costs have to come down to accelerate residential and commercial customer adoption. A new analysis and report from Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) and Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI)—Lessons from Australia: Reducing Solar PV Costs Through Installation Labor Efficiency—identifies opportunities for the U.S. solar market to take important steps in that direction.

    Non-hardware costs (permitting/inspection/interconnection (PII), customer acquisition, installation, and margins/overhead) now dominate system prices in the U.S. For sub-10-kW systems, 80 percent of solar system cost decline in the U.S. since 2008 has been due to hardware price reductions. In the U.S., non-hardware costs now account for 70% of system costs. Setting aside margins/overhead, the U.S. spends $1.22/W on PII, customer acquisition, and system installation. PV leaders Germany and Australia, on the other hand, spend just $0.33/W and $0.65/W, respectively. The U.S. clearly can and should pursue significant cost reduction opportunities to eliminate this difference.

    RMI and GTRI previously launched a PV installation labor data collection and analysis effort under the SIMPLE BoS project, which investigated differences in non-hardware costs between the U.S. and Germany, including installation labor. 

    This 2013 report provided a detailed breakdown of primary drivers of PV installation labor cost differences between the U.S. and Germany. Now, in 2014, RMI and GTRI are following up on that groundbreaking work with further investigation of Australian solar installations.

    Australia has emerged as a dominant player in the world residential solar market, with more than 10 percent of households possessing a solar system on the roof and system prices rivaling Germany’s. Even as feed-in tariffs (FITs) have declined, demand in Australia for residential rooftop solar has remained high and costs have continued to decline. Much of this is due to a focus on customer-owned PV, and thus an extremely competitive marketplace around system cost. Both retailers and installers have been forced to lean processes in order to offer lower pricing and gain market share; they rely on high volume rather than high margin to remain profitable. 

    According to our on-site analysis, Australian installers are averaging 6.1 labor-hours per kW solar installed, while the U.S. is more than 50 percent higher at 9.4 labor-hours per kW installed. This is similar to averages observed in other industry surveys and studies.


    Unlike Germany, Australia does not use motorized lifts, scaffolds, or other advanced installation equipment. Instead, economic incentives drive labor—installers in Australia receive a flat rate per installation, and thus make greater profit by mounting more systems in less time. That Australian installers were able to shift so quickly towards a one-day install as an industry standard indicates that Germany is not an outlier; optimized installations are possible and should be pursued at both the U.S. and international levels.
    We noted several factors that may increase efficiency based on observations and analysis of installation practices in Australia, Germany, and the U.S.: 
    • Optimizing the pre-installation process
    • Reducing time spent on base installations, especially for clay-tile roofs
    • Pursuing rail designs that minimize installation labor
    • Reducing the number of meters installed in each electrical system to monitor PV output
    • Viewing the one-day installation goal as an opportunity to reduce time spent on non-production activities such as meals, travel, breaks, setup, and cleanup
    These opportunities vary in magnitude, but in combination could have a significant impact on the number of labor-hours/kW U.S. installers typically invest in system installations. We believe installers in the U.S. could approach or go beyond Australian levels of efficiency by pursuing these primary measures, as well as other opportunities that help the industry approach the one-day installation as standard. 

    If it can be done in Australia and Germany, there is no reason it cannot be done in the U.S.

    We hope this report on Australia, the report on Germany, and all follow-on work under the SIMPLE BoS project will help the U.S. industry continue to reduce solar PV costs and enable the widespread, cost-effective deployment of residential solar PV systems.

    Download the report 
    Posted by surfie999@gmail.com at 10:21 No comments:
    Labels: Australia, costs, PV systems, solar electricity, solar power

    Thursday, June 26, 2014

    Seralini Study on GM Food Crops

    Seralini study republished

    I think on balance that the work probably does not adequately convince me that the GM corn is a prime culprit causing harm to the animals [ in this case rats].  Probably too many confounding factors involved to be a clearcut decision.  BUT……..publishing does open the arguments and debate to others, and that it does.  But logical open debate is how science moves forward.  Let it continue!

    The article is sourced from Queensland Country Life, but there are comments from elsewhere.

    Wider circulation aids the debate on both sides.


    http://static.fairfaxrural.com.au/multimedia/images/large/2079764.jpg   

    http://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/images/1pxclear.gifSeralini is trying to convince us that he has a magic coin that only comes up ‘heads’
    http://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/images/1pxclear.gif
    RELATED
    French GM study raises red flags on both sides
    GM study attacked anew
    Seralini retraction welcomed

    Republication of the infamous Seralini study on the toxicity of genetically modified (GM) food crops has been met with renewed criticism from the global scientific community.

    French researcher Gilles Seralini’s paper into the toxicity of glyphosate-resistant GM maize on rats was initially published by Food and Chemical Toxicology in September 2012, then retracted by the journal in December 2013 after scathing reviews from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the Australian biotech sector.

    It is being republished on 24 June in Environmental Sciences Europe, an Open Access journal, but without significant alteration.

    The authors claimed their study showed GM maize causes tumours in rats, but the paper’s design and methodology was pilloried on first publication, primarily for lack of controls.

    Alan McHughen, plant biotechnologist at the College of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, UC Riverside, USA, said the number of rats used was too small to detect a meaningful difference in treatments – and that this had not changed with republication of the material.  “For those not familiar, it’s as if Seralini tossed a coin two times, and the coin came up ‘heads’ both times,” Dr McHughen said.  “With this result, Seralini is trying to convince us that he has a magic coin that only comes up ‘heads’.

    Dr McHughen noted the strain of rats used (Sprague-Dawley) have a natural predisposition to form tumours, regardless of treatment.  “Seralini has not and can not justify this fatal error in experimental design.”

    Matthew Cossey, chief executive at CropLife Australia, said the scientific community would not accept "junk science".  “The claims made in the report contradicted the vast weight of evidence in the form of hundreds of independent, peer reviewed studies and decades of research, which show that approved GM crops are as safe as their conventional counterparts,” he said.

    Senior Lecturer in the University of Adelaide School of Medicine Sciences, Dr Ian Musgrave, said the “major flaws in this study still remain”.

    Dr Musgrave said Professor Seralini used the wrong controls and failed to consistently take into account dose response or measured outcomes.  “The GM corn had no effect on the number of tumours - Roundup (glyphosate) even decreased the number of tumours in male rats, as did the combination of Roundup and GM corn in male rats... (with) no consistent effect in female rats.
    “This shows that all we are seeing in these results is due to random variation in a poorly controlled experiment.”

    Associate Professor Peter Dearden, Director of Genetics at the University of Otago in New Zealand, said the paper being published was “identical to the first one”. However, he said the flawed study raised some interesting points which should be further developed with proper methodology.  “The paper was, in my mind, inconclusive, but pointed a direction in which future research could go,” Prof Dearden said.  “Inconclusive data is no reason to retract a peer-reviewed and published paper.  “Retracting the original paper in this unusual way has not served the scientific process well. All good science is a debate, and one that should be held publically in published journals. Only through open publication, replication and exchange of scientific data can we use science effectively.  “Controversial studies should not be buried because of public argument. They should be investigated, repeated, and new data published to either disprove or support the original findings. Only then do we get a clear and robust argument.”

    Gene Ethics director Bob Phelps said there had been a concerted effort to discredit Prof Seralini’s work by the pro-GM lobbyists, and the Seralini study met none of the scientific grounds for retraction.  “The guidelines for retractions in scientific publishing established by the Committee on Publication Ethics... state that the only grounds for a journal to retract a paper are clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, honest error or plagiarism - and this study meets none of these criteria.”

    The Safe Food Foundation (SFF) welcomed the republication as "vindication of Seralini's work", saying the study raised serious issues about the safety of glyphosate and GM crops.  SFF director Scott Kinnear said renewed focus on the Seralini study - coming on the heels of organic farmer Steve Marsh's appeal - highlighted deficiencies in regulatory assessments for safety.

    Mr Marsh unsuccessfully sued his GM-growing neighbour for damages after alleged GM cross-contamination of his crop.  "Justice Martin commented that there were no safety issues with the GM canola grown (in the Marsh v Baxter case)," Mr Kinnear said.  "We disagree with Justice Martin and find that this study is aligned with other studies that point to disruption of the normal hormonal and fertility systems in laboratory animals exposed to low levels of Roundup and GMOs."


    Posted by surfie999@gmail.com at 01:30 No comments:
    Labels: food quality, food safety, GM crops, Seralini

    Wednesday, June 25, 2014

    Fuelled by Urine - Cheaper than Platinum

    Urine powered fuel cell
    Cheap fuel cells that use carbonised and dried urine as a catalyst in place of platinum could be a reality in the near future.

    Fuel cells often use platinum as a catalyst, driving up the cost of the technology. Researchers have been looking at ways to replace the metal with carbon nanostructures, but those are expensive to produce too.
    Researchers from the Department of Advanced Materials Chemistry, Korea University demonstrated that equally effective carbon compounds can be extracted from urine — making them a cheap stand-in for platinum or synthetic carbon.
    The scientists collected urine samples from healthy individuals, which they heated to evaporate the water contents, leaving behind a dried, yellowish deposit. They then super-heated various test samples of dried urine in a range between 700 and 1,000 degrees Celsius for six hours to carbonise the urine.
    The heating process caused salts and other elements to gasify and leave behind carbon. Urine is loaded with other elements besides carbon, which makes the leftover carbon highly porous — ideal for fuel cell catalysts.
    Most importantly, the urine carbon was an excellent conductor of electricity, especially the batch that was heated to 1,000 degrees. Researchers said this is the first time carbon was extracted from urine using this simple method.
    According to the scientists, roughly 300 to 400 milligrams of urine carbon can be extracted from a single litre of urine, and the ease of harvest means this could very well be a scalable idea.
    Posted by surfie999@gmail.com at 02:00 No comments:
    Labels: biomass energy, fuel cell, platinum, renewable energy, urine

    Tuesday, June 24, 2014

    GM Breeding Explained Simply

    GM: from the field to the lab......and back to the field!!

    PETER LANGRIDGE - AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR PLANT FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS
    23 Jun, 2014 

    GM canola seed: GM canola planting will rise in Australia this year.
    GM canola seed: GM canola planting will rise in Australia this year.

    Breeders are always looking for new sources of variation

    Welcome to GM in Australia, a The Conversation series looking at the facts, ethics, regulations and research into genetically modified (GM) crops. In this first instalment, Peter Langridge describes two GM techniques: selective breeding and genetic engineering.



    GENETIC modification (GM) sounds very laboratory-based – people in white coats inserting and deleting genes – but the vast majority of GM work was completed in the field through selective breeding.

    Early Middle Eastern farmers collected grain from natural grasslands, but they needed to time their harvest very carefully. If they were too early the grain wouldn’t store well, and if they were too late the grain would spread over the ground making collection difficult.

    At some stage, one of these early farmers must have noticed that some heads remained fixed on their stems even after the grain was fully dry. He obviously didn’t understand this at the time, but these were plants with a mutation in the genes controlling seed dispersal.

    Farmers began preferentially choosing plants with this useful mutation and planting them, perhaps the first case of breeding and selecting for a novel trait.

    Exploiting genetic variation




    Gregor Mendel. Wikimedia, CC BY


    Systematic breeding really began in the early 1900s when scientists rediscovered Silesian monk Gregor Mendel’s groundbreaking work on genetic inheritance in peas.

    Breeding involves utilising genetic variation to produce new combinations of genes and gene variants. A breeder will cross two different lines and then select offspring that have improved performance.

    Breeders are always looking for new sources of variation, normally from within the elite germplasm pool – that is, within established varieties. Many important traits, such as disease resistance, are controlled by single genes and can be crossed into elite lines, with only the resistant offspring selected.

    But for many crops the level of diversity available within the elite germplasm pool is very narrow and breeders must look further afield for novel variation. This search led breeders to explore land races (varieties grown by traditional farmers) and even wild relatives (undomesticated progenitors of our modern crops).

    In many cases crosses between the wild relatives and modern lines will not produce normal seeds, but the embryos can often be isolated from the developing seed and grown in sterile tissue culture to produce viable, fertile plants.

    This technique, called embryo rescue, has been widely used and many modern cultivars contain genes from wild relatives.





    danbruell/Flickr, CC BY-ND


    The normal number of genes present in a crop plant is around 30,000 to 40,000 – the same as for humans. In making the crosses all 30,000 genes from the wild relative are introduced but the breeder may only want one gene.

    The genes are linked along chromosomes with each chromosome carrying several thousand genes. The breeders need to break up the chromosomes from the wild relative into small fragments so that only the desired region is transferred – a process called chromosome engineering.

    This can take several decades of work, making the use of wide crosses technically difficult and slow. Breeders want other methods of generating useful variation.

    Engineering mutations

    In the 1950s the idea of inducing mutations became an important technique for creating new variation. This involved using ionising radiation, such as X or gamma rays, or chemical mutagens.

    These techniques produce random damage to the genetic information in the plant by changing the DNA directly or knocking out segments of the genome (the genetic make-up). Most mutations are deleterious, and the mutagenesis usually generates many thousands of unwanted changes, so the clean-up can be slow.

    After exposing the plants to the mutagen, the breeders need to select for the beneficial mutations and remove the deleterious mutations.

    Scientifically the ideal solution would be to be able to take a gene from any source and introduce it into your crop plant to change the plant’s characteristics. This would allow breeders to use variation from diverse sources and make changes just one gene at a time without the extensive collateral damage done by mutagenesis or wide crosses. This is what genetic engineering offers.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMPE5wlB3Zk


    Enter the lab coats …


    The first genetically engineered crops were produced in the 1980s and, as in all areas of science, the technology continues to advance. The most widely used method today takes advantage of a natural DNA transfer mechanism.

    Several groups of soil bacteria are able to engineer plants for their own benefit. These bacteria transfer a segment of their genome into the plant’s genome so that the transformed plant cells will proliferate and produce compounds that only the bacteria can use. In this way the bacteria control the plant development to produce nutrients for the bacteria.

    The mechanisms for this type of natural genetic engineering are now well understood, allowing scientists to change the DNA segment transferred so that the genes causing altered plant growth are removed and new genes inserted.

    How does this work practically? In a laboratory the scientist will design and build a DNA sequence containing specific sequences that delineate the region of DNA to be transferred (the left and right borders). 

    They then insert the gene of interest and usually a selectable marker, such as resistance to a herbicide.





    Agrobacterium tumefaciens attaching to a plant cell. Wikimedia, CC BY


    This construct is then introduced into a bacteria called Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which readily takes up DNA. The bacteria are then applied to growing plant tissues in sterile culture.

    After a period the bacteria are removed and the plant tissues placed onto media containing the herbicide. Only the plant cells that have been transformed (those that took up the construct from the bacterium) are able to grow and divide.

    These cells are allowed to multiply and divide until they produce plants, which are taken out of sterile culture to a glasshouse where they can grow to maturity. The genes that have been transferred will now be included in the genetic make-up of the plant.

    Different species and even varieties will differ in their ability to take up DNA from the bacterium and to regenerate normal plants. Where in the genome the new DNA inserts is usually random but will preferentially occur in regions containing active genes.

    Extensive growth trials and evaluation are needed to ensure that the transgenic or genetically engineered plant behaves as expected.

    … and back to the field


    In Australia all aspects of genetic engineering research are closely regulated. The researcher, organisation and facilities used must all be licensed and meet tight standards.

    Before a field trial can be grown, the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) conducts a detailed risk assessment of the genes used, the reasons for the trial, and the design and management of the trial site.

    The OGTR have issued 103 licenses for field trials covering 14 different crops. In Australia 37 genetically engineered crops have been approved for commercial cultivation for seven different species, but only GM cotton (eight different events) and canola (three events) are grown to any great extent.

    The resistance to GM crops in many parts of the world has encouraged scientists to look for alternative techniques for making targeted changes to the genetic make-up of crops and other organisms.

    For example, a new technique called “genome editing” allows us to make specific changes to native genes within the plant that are essentially identical to the changes induced by mutagenesis but at only one site rather than all over the genome. Mutagenesis is widely used and is not subject to regulation – will the same apply to genome editing?


    There are other developments that are also challenging the community’s views on new technologies. How will people feel about GM crops where a native gene has been isolated, changed and re-inserted (a process known as cisgenics)?

    What about using GM rootstocks engineered for resistance to root diseases, but grafted with non-GM scion so that they produce non-GM apples or avocados?

    These questions are now challenging the regulators since the first examples are starting to become available.


    Peter Langridge, Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, receives research funding from Pioneer/Dupont, the Australian Research Council, the Grains Research and Development Corporation, the South Australian government, Australia/India Strategic Research Fund and the US AID program. He provides advice to several public sector research organisation in Europe, North America and to international agricultural aid programs.
    This article was originally published on The Conversation.
    Read the original article. 
    --------------------------------------------------

    This is a very readable overview of breeding using genetic engineering techniques.  It is increasingly common as a technique to generate variation, with more conventional selection and assessment being the finishing options.  Genetics is one of the fields where big data really first appeared.  More is better for plant breeding, it seems.......a real numbers game.  More plants to select from and the chances of both qualitative and quantitative traits being adequately assessed!  
    Posted by surfie999@gmail.com at 04:30 No comments:
    Labels: genetics, genomics, GM crops, plant breeding

    Monday, June 23, 2014

    Solar Energy Costs Falling Rapidly in Both USA and China - To Equal Coal Prices VERY Soon


    China Might Be Winning The Race To Reduce Solar Costs

    I did not write most of this material, but the concepts discussed are very relevant for Australia, with major debate now about to commence on removing the Renewable Energy Target and Carbon Tax legislation in Australia.

    Are we going in the wrong direction?   This review seems to posit that solar costs will soon equal or be less than energy from the fossil fuel sources [ particularly coal], using PV systems.  This will occur within a few years, and that is well within the planing horizons for new power stations, and also for homeowners to consider the implications for them directly, with self supplied PV power.

    Many people, even fanatical advocates of solar power, are unaware just how close we are to reaching a critical milestone in the industry. Within a fairly short space of time, solar generated electricity will be fully cost competitive with coal-powered electricity — at least if the governments of the world’s two largest energy consuming nations have their way.


    Both the U.S. and China have a stated goal of reducing the cost of solar generated electricity to that level, and quickly. How they are going about it says a lot about how each economic system works.


    In the U.S., despite the complaints of some that a drift toward government control is taking place, private initiative and free markets still rule. The Department of Energy launched the SunShot initiative in 2011, with a stated goal of reducing the cost of solar power to be fully competitive with conventional energy sources by the end of this decade. The program funds grants, incentives and competitions to encourage private sector research that will improve the efficiency and lower the cost of solar energy.


    The Chinese, faced with what is in many ways a more urgent need to achieve the same thing, have taken a different approach. In a manner more in keeping with their history and current economic system, they are beating the problem over the head with piles of cash until the desired outcome is achieved. It looks, if this excellent Michael Sankowski piece at Monetary Realism is to be believed, as if they are getting mighty close.


    Sankowski maintains that, driven by high levels of pollution and national security concerns, the Chinese government asked a question back in the early 2000s: “How Much Will It Cost To Make Solar Cheaper Than Coal?” The answer was based on Swanson’s Law that states that every doubling of photovoltaic (PV) solar capacity results in a 20 percent reduction in unit cost. Testing that theory, because of low levels of production at that time, would only have cost around $10 billion — a small price to pay for the chance of cheap, clean energy that didn’t rely on importing coal from Australia.


    When Swanson’s Law still worked after a couple of doublings of capacity the Chinese government stepped up their efforts. As a result, Suntech now expects the goal to be achieved by 2016, or 2017 at the latest. That’s right: 2016. A couple of years. Of course, Suntech has an interest in exaggerating somewhat, but even so, that is stunningly close.


    According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, coal accounted for 69 percent of China’s energy production as recently as 2011. Cost comparative solar power and a centralized government committed to change will make that number laughable in a few years.


    It should be borne in mind that reducing the cost of solar electricity to parity with coal in China is not the same as it is in America, if for no other reason than that electricity in general, and coal-powered electricity in particular, is more expensive in China than in the US.


    SunShot, however, has also been successful, and claims a 60 percent reduction in cost since its inception three years ago. Many believe that their stated goal of solar power at $0.06 per kilowatt hour (kWH) is achievable by 2018. Some of that cost reduction is no doubt down to China ramping up capacity at such a rate and flooding the market, but there have been technological advances over that time, as well.

    You can argue all day about which approach is correct. History shows us that innovation from the private sector is the most effective, long lasting change agent there is, but the Chinese approach of heavily subsidizing a massive increase in PV production capacity has been effective. Unfair, short sighted and disruptive, maybe, but effective nonetheless.

    Command economies may be terrible at some things but when the rapid marshalling of resources is needed to solve a problem they can be very good at doing whatever it takes.


    The simple fact is that with both innovation and increased capacity, the cost of solar energy has fallen considerably over the last few years and continues to do so. If, as looks likely, it does become truly cost comparative with coal in the next few years, then the days of cheap, clean, renewable energy dominating the world’s two biggest energy markets may be closer than you think.


    Will that apply to Australia as well?  Based on current thinking in this country.........do not hold your breath.  However, it is obvious that with our energy costs from fossil fuel moderately high, it does seem that change might be coming sooner than most people have really thought it would be, here in Australia!


    Article by Martin Tillier, first appearing in Oilprice.com.
    Posted by surfie999@gmail.com at 10:14 No comments:
    Labels: electricity, fossil fuel, solar electricity, solar energy, solar power
    Newer Posts Older Posts Home
    Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

    About Me

    surfie999@gmail.com
    View my complete profile

    Links

    • GMO Pundit
    • Kapillary Irrigation Sub surface System
    • Compost Australia
    • Microbe Pundit
    • Agriculture information and news - Lakshmanan's blog
    • Met Bureau - NT weather
    • Biobin - for organic waste
    • Ecoflex - a new way of managing waste tyres
    • Australian Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology
    • Nufarm Agrochemicals
    • Sygenta Agrochemicals
    • Google News
    • Best Business Blogs
    • The Monsoon Frog
    • Above Capricorn Technologies

    Weather + Counter

    Blog Archive

    • ▼  2020 (5)
      • ▼  March (1)
        • Stopping Fruit Mould - Without Pesticides
      • ►  February (2)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2019 (22)
      • ►  December (2)
      • ►  November (6)
      • ►  June (1)
      • ►  May (1)
      • ►  April (1)
      • ►  March (3)
      • ►  February (5)
      • ►  January (3)
    • ►  2018 (32)
      • ►  October (1)
      • ►  August (3)
      • ►  July (5)
      • ►  June (2)
      • ►  May (7)
      • ►  April (4)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (5)
      • ►  January (1)
    • ►  2017 (21)
      • ►  December (1)
      • ►  October (3)
      • ►  September (1)
      • ►  June (6)
      • ►  April (2)
      • ►  March (1)
      • ►  February (2)
      • ►  January (5)
    • ►  2016 (39)
      • ►  December (2)
      • ►  November (3)
      • ►  October (2)
      • ►  September (2)
      • ►  August (8)
      • ►  July (1)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (2)
      • ►  April (1)
      • ►  March (8)
      • ►  February (3)
      • ►  January (4)
    • ►  2015 (64)
      • ►  December (9)
      • ►  November (7)
      • ►  October (8)
      • ►  September (11)
      • ►  August (1)
      • ►  July (3)
      • ►  June (4)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (4)
      • ►  March (1)
      • ►  February (3)
      • ►  January (9)
    • ►  2014 (65)
      • ►  December (8)
      • ►  November (5)
      • ►  October (9)
      • ►  September (1)
      • ►  August (3)
      • ►  July (10)
      • ►  June (11)
      • ►  May (7)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (2)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2013 (99)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (5)
      • ►  October (6)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ►  August (12)
      • ►  July (9)
      • ►  June (8)
      • ►  May (12)
      • ►  April (15)
      • ►  March (11)
      • ►  February (9)
      • ►  January (5)
    • ►  2012 (59)
      • ►  December (2)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (8)
      • ►  September (3)
      • ►  August (5)
      • ►  July (6)
      • ►  June (11)
      • ►  May (7)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (6)
      • ►  January (3)
    • ►  2011 (78)
      • ►  December (2)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (7)
      • ►  September (11)
      • ►  August (3)
      • ►  July (10)
      • ►  June (5)
      • ►  May (12)
      • ►  April (6)
      • ►  March (6)
      • ►  February (6)
      • ►  January (6)
    • ►  2010 (44)
      • ►  December (1)
      • ►  November (7)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (1)
      • ►  August (2)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (7)
      • ►  May (10)
      • ►  April (2)
      • ►  March (2)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2009 (52)
      • ►  November (1)
      • ►  October (6)
      • ►  September (7)
      • ►  August (5)
      • ►  July (5)
      • ►  June (8)
      • ►  April (2)
      • ►  March (7)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (7)
    • ►  2008 (59)
      • ►  December (4)
      • ►  November (8)
      • ►  October (6)
      • ►  September (3)
      • ►  August (4)
      • ►  July (3)
      • ►  June (5)
      • ►  May (3)
      • ►  April (4)
      • ►  March (5)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (10)
    • ►  2007 (69)
      • ►  December (2)
      • ►  November (7)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ►  August (3)
      • ►  July (5)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (20)
      • ►  April (5)
      • ►  March (9)
      • ►  February (5)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2006 (11)
      • ►  December (4)
      • ►  November (7)

    Labels

    • 1974 (1)
    • 2 (2)
    • 2016 (1)
    • 2017 (1)
    • 2018 (1)
    • 4 (1)
    • 4-D (2)
    • 4-D ester (1)
    • 4-DB (1)
    • 5-T (1)
    • ABA (1)
    • abattoir (9)
    • aboriginal (1)
    • Abscisic acid (1)
    • accountants (1)
    • acid mine drainage (1)
    • Aedes albopictus (1)
    • aerial sensors (1)
    • aerial survey (1)
    • aerospace (1)
    • Africa (4)
    • African Mahogany (4)
    • Agent orange (1)
    • agribusiness (6)
    • agrichar (10)
    • agricultural chemicals (9)
    • agricultural products (2)
    • agricultural science (7)
    • agriculture (135)
    • agriculture jatropha (3)
    • agrochemicals (1)
    • agroforestry (13)
    • agronomic systems (1)
    • agronomy (1)
    • aid (2)
    • aircraft. airplane (1)
    • algae to biodiesel (6)
    • allergens (1)
    • allergy (1)
    • almonds (1)
    • alternate pasteurisation (1)
    • alternative energy (2)
    • aluminium (1)
    • amine (1)
    • anaerobic digestion (2)
    • animal disease (1)
    • animal welfare (3)
    • Animals Australia (2)
    • ants (1)
    • aphids (1)
    • apiarists (1)
    • apiary (1)
    • apiculture (1)
    • apps (1)
    • aquaculture (1)
    • aquatain (1)
    • aquifer (1)
    • aquifer management (1)
    • Argentina (1)
    • Argentine Bahia grass (1)
    • arsenic (3)
    • art (1)
    • Asia (2)
    • asian honey bees (1)
    • asian monsoon (2)
    • asian tiger mosquitoes (1)
    • asian vegetables (1)
    • Asperger's syndrome (1)
    • atmosphere (1)
    • Australia (22)
    • Australia. (1)
    • autism (1)
    • axonopus compressus (2)
    • bacterial blight rice (1)
    • Bactrocera dorsalis (1)
    • bahia grass (2)
    • banana (1)
    • banana freckle. biosecurity (1)
    • banana streak (1)
    • bananas (5)
    • Banco Santander 130th anniversary (1)
    • barley (2)
    • battery back up. renewables (1)
    • bauxite (1)
    • beans (1)
    • bee keeping (1)
    • beef (22)
    • beef economics (2)
    • beef exports (9)
    • bees (2)
    • beneficial fungi (1)
    • beneficial insects (1)
    • berms (1)
    • best practice (1)
    • BHP Billiton (1)
    • Bill Gates (1)
    • biochar (11)
    • biocontrol (2)
    • biodiesel (16)
    • biofuels (18)
    • biofumigation (1)
    • biogas (1)
    • biomass energy (3)
    • bioplastics (3)
    • bioremediation (4)
    • biosecurity (9)
    • biowaste (1)
    • birds (1)
    • black soldier fly (2)
    • black soldier fly larvae (1)
    • black tiger prawns (1)
    • blackfella beef (1)
    • BluGen (1)
    • bokashi (1)
    • BOM (1)
    • book (1)
    • Borneo (1)
    • botany (2)
    • Bothriochloa spp (1)
    • Bothriochloa spp weed (1)
    • Botrytis (1)
    • box jelly fish (1)
    • Brachiaria (1)
    • brahman (1)
    • brahman cattle (4)
    • Brazil (5)
    • breeding (1)
    • broad leaf carpet grass (2)
    • Brussels sprouts (1)
    • BSE (2)
    • Bt cotton (2)
    • buffalo (1)
    • business (1)
    • business profile (2)
    • buying Compadre zoysia seed (1)
    • C3 (1)
    • C4 (1)
    • cacao (1)
    • cadmium (1)
    • caliente 199 (1)
    • camel (2)
    • cancer (1)
    • cane toads (1)
    • cap and trade (4)
    • carabeef (1)
    • carbon (60)
    • carbon abatement (1)
    • carbon capture (4)
    • carbon economy (4)
    • carbon emissions (3)
    • carbon tax (10)
    • carcinogen (1)
    • career (1)
    • carpet grass (4)
    • cassava (1)
    • Catholic Cathedral Darwin (1)
    • cattle (28)
    • cattle disease (3)
    • cattle export (30)
    • cattle herd numbers (4)
    • Cavendish (1)
    • Cavendish banana (1)
    • CCD (2)
    • cereals (4)
    • chaff cart (1)
    • chilli (3)
    • chilli pepper (2)
    • China (17)
    • China live export (1)
    • Chironex fleckeri (1)
    • chocolate (4)
    • CHP (1)
    • Christmas (1)
    • Christmas tree (1)
    • Chrysopogon acidulatus (2)
    • CIMMYT (1)
    • circular economy (1)
    • citrus (2)
    • citrus canker (2)
    • citrus greening (1)
    • city farming (1)
    • clean technology (10)
    • clean water (3)
    • climate (26)
    • climate change (61)
    • climate policy (3)
    • CO2 (5)
    • coal (1)
    • coal ash (1)
    • coffee (2)
    • coffee pods (2)
    • cold chain (1)
    • cold weather tolerance (2)
    • Coles (4)
    • Colony Collapse Disorder (1)
    • communications (1)
    • Compadre (1)
    • Compadre zoysia (45)
    • Compadre zoysia seed (18)
    • Companion zoysia (4)
    • compost (38)
    • compost berms (1)
    • composting (2)
    • computers (3)
    • concrete (1)
    • conservation tillage (1)
    • cool roofs (1)
    • cool weather (1)
    • corn (1)
    • costs (1)
    • cotton (4)
    • cotton genome (1)
    • court case GM contamination (1)
    • cover crops (1)
    • CRC CARE (1)
    • CRISPR (3)
    • crop production (1)
    • crops (17)
    • cure for warts (1)
    • customer referrals (1)
    • cut height (1)
    • cv (1)
    • Cyclone Marcus (1)
    • Cyclone Tracy (1)
    • cyclones (3)
    • cyclonic tree damage (1)
    • cyclotides (1)
    • dairy (1)
    • dairy cows (1)
    • Darwin (10)
    • Darwin CBD (1)
    • Darwin Waterfront Project (1)
    • defence (1)
    • Delta T (1)
    • Dengue fever control (1)
    • desalinination (1)
    • dicamba (1)
    • diesel (1)
    • digital future (1)
    • dingoes. wild dogs (1)
    • dioxin (2)
    • disaster (1)
    • disease (1)
    • dogs (1)
    • domestic jobs (3)
    • donkeys (2)
    • dormancy (1)
    • dormant (1)
    • drainage (1)
    • Drive herbicide (2)
    • drone (3)
    • drones (8)
    • drought (11)
    • dry season (1)
    • duckweed (2)
    • durian (1)
    • dwarf carpet grass (2)
    • e-invoices (1)
    • e-learning (1)
    • e-waste (2)
    • earliest life on earth (1)
    • early rainfall onset (1)
    • earth (3)
    • ebola (1)
    • ebola detection (1)
    • ebola testing (1)
    • ecoflex (3)
    • effluent reuse (13)
    • eggs (4)
    • electricity (1)
    • Elmich (1)
    • Embraer aircraft (1)
    • emergence (1)
    • emergency (1)
    • Emissions trading (4)
    • emoji (1)
    • Empire turf (7)
    • encycical (1)
    • energy (30)
    • energy efficiency (14)
    • envir (1)
    • environment (73)
    • erosion (17)
    • erosion control (3)
    • ESCP (1)
    • establishing lawn (1)
    • establishment (1)
    • ester (1)
    • ethanol (1)
    • ETS (2)
    • EU (3)
    • EU ban (1)
    • EU fishing policy reform (1)
    • EU ruling on CRSPR technology (1)
    • Europe (2)
    • exotic ants (1)
    • export fodder (1)
    • famine (1)
    • FAO (1)
    • farm product waste (1)
    • farm technology (1)
    • farmers (1)
    • fart (1)
    • feedlots (3)
    • feral animals (2)
    • Fertcare (2)
    • fertiliser (4)
    • fertilisers (11)
    • fire (1)
    • fire abatement program (1)
    • fish (1)
    • fishing (1)
    • flashmob (1)
    • Flinders Ranges (1)
    • floods (1)
    • florida (1)
    • Flow hive (1)
    • FMD (1)
    • fodder (4)
    • fodder crops (2)
    • food (8)
    • food bowl (1)
    • food conservation (1)
    • food energy (2)
    • food loss (4)
    • food prices (11)
    • food quality (20)
    • food safety (2)
    • food wastage (7)
    • food waste (12)
    • food waste. foodwastage (1)
    • Foot and mouth disease (2)
    • forage (1)
    • forage quality (2)
    • forest cover (1)
    • fossil fuel (2)
    • FRGP (1)
    • fruit (8)
    • fruit flies (1)
    • fruit fly (2)
    • FSANZ (1)
    • fuel cell (1)
    • fumig8tor (1)
    • funding (1)
    • fungi (1)
    • future work force (2)
    • GAANTRY (1)
    • gamba grass (1)
    • gas (2)
    • gas to liquids (2)
    • Gates Foundation (3)
    • gene editing (2)
    • gene technology (3)
    • generosity (1)
    • genetic engineering (2)
    • genetic improvement (1)
    • genetics (19)
    • genomics (1)
    • geology (1)
    • geophysical survey (1)
    • geothermal (1)
    • germination (2)
    • giant african land snail (1)
    • giant african snail (1)
    • glass recycling (2)
    • Global Megatrends (1)
    • glyphosate (6)
    • Glyphosate ban EU (1)
    • GM (3)
    • GM canola (1)
    • GM contamination (1)
    • GM crops (30)
    • GMO (3)
    • god and lawn care (1)
    • golf course (1)
    • Google Earth (2)
    • gossamer albatross (1)
    • grain yield (1)
    • grass (2)
    • grass fed beef (1)
    • grass slashing (1)
    • grass weeds (1)
    • green building (1)
    • green cover (1)
    • green fatigue (9)
    • green infrastructure (1)
    • green mark award (1)
    • green roof (11)
    • green wall (7)
    • green walls (1)
    • green waste (3)
    • greenhouse (1)
    • greenhouse gas (19)
    • groundwater (1)
    • growth regulators (2)
    • gyres (1)
    • Haiyan (1)
    • hand washing (1)
    • Harrington seed destructor (1)
    • hazelnuts (1)
    • head lice (1)
    • health (2)
    • heat island (1)
    • heavy metals (1)
    • heirloom seeds (1)
    • heirloom varieties (1)
    • herbicide quality (1)
    • herbicide resistance (1)
    • herbicides (10)
    • hi tech (1)
    • high rise agriculture (1)
    • highway (1)
    • honey bees (5)
    • hornless Friesian cow (1)
    • hornless Holstein (1)
    • horticulture (48)
    • hot weather (3)
    • hotchain (1)
    • huanglongbing (1)
    • hurricane tree damage (1)
    • hydro energy (1)
    • hydrology (1)
    • hydroponic growing (3)
    • hydroponics (1)
    • hydroseeding (1)
    • hyper accumulator plants (1)
    • immature compost (1)
    • India (4)
    • Indonesia (29)
    • indoor farming (1)
    • indoor farming. (1)
    • indoor plants (2)
    • indoor vegetable growing (2)
    • infrastructure (1)
    • innovation (1)
    • insect dispersal (1)
    • insect larvae (1)
    • insecticide (2)
    • insecticides (3)
    • insects (4)
    • insulated packaging (1)
    • intellectual property (2)
    • international plant health year 2020 (1)
    • International Year of Soils (2)
    • internet (1)
    • invasive ants (1)
    • IP (2)
    • IPM (1)
    • Ireland (1)
    • iron levels (1)
    • irrigation (17)
    • irrigation systems (2)
    • irrigation systems (1)
    • islands (1)
    • IT (2)
    • Italy (1)
    • Jade-AU (1)
    • Jansen potash project (1)
    • job growth (1)
    • Kalumburu (1)
    • Katherine (1)
    • kenaf (1)
    • Khaya sp (1)
    • Kimberley (1)
    • Kofi Annan (1)
    • Kota Kinabalu (1)
    • Kununurra (1)
    • labelling (1)
    • lamb (1)
    • lamb exports (2)
    • land development (4)
    • land management (12)
    • Landsat (1)
    • landscape (1)
    • largest solar plant (1)
    • lawn (4)
    • lawn care (2)
    • lawn grubs (5)
    • lawn mowing (1)
    • lawn myths (1)
    • lawn seed (2)
    • lawns (1)
    • laying turf (2)
    • lead (1)
    • LED (1)
    • legume pastures (1)
    • Les Baux en Provence (1)
    • leucaena (1)
    • light (1)
    • lighting (1)
    • litter (1)
    • live (1)
    • live cattle export (11)
    • live cattle trade (34)
    • live export (2)
    • livestock (36)
    • livestock emissions (3)
    • livestock methane (2)
    • LNG (3)
    • loess (1)
    • low maintenance (1)
    • mad cow disease (1)
    • mail delivery (1)
    • malaria (1)
    • managing old drugs (1)
    • mango (1)
    • mango emoji (1)
    • mangoes (2)
    • manufacturing (3)
    • marine stingers (1)
    • marine transport (1)
    • market (1)
    • Marrara soccer stadium (1)
    • materials (1)
    • maturing zoysia grass (1)
    • McDonalds (1)
    • meat (4)
    • median strip (1)
    • median strips (1)
    • medicines (1)
    • megatrends (1)
    • melbourne markets (1)
    • Melbourne zoysia (2)
    • meliodosis (1)
    • melons (1)
    • mendel (1)
    • metereology (1)
    • methane (8)
    • MFT gene (1)
    • microbiology (4)
    • microbionome (1)
    • microgrid (1)
    • microplastics (1)
    • microwaves (1)
    • milk (5)
    • milk processing (1)
    • mimosa (1)
    • mining (6)
    • misleading advertising (1)
    • modern agriculture (2)
    • moisture (1)
    • molecular markers (3)
    • money (1)
    • monsoon (2)
    • Monument herbicide (2)
    • mosquitoes (3)
    • mould (1)
    • mowing (3)
    • mowing height (1)
    • mulch (4)
    • mung bean (1)
    • mungbeans (1)
    • Myanmar (1)
    • mycorrhiza (4)
    • napier grass (1)
    • nature of work (1)
    • NBN (1)
    • neonicitinoids (1)
    • neonicotinoids (1)
    • neonics (1)
    • new varieties (1)
    • new varieties of potato (2)
    • niche food (1)
    • nickel (2)
    • nickel hyperaccumulation (1)
    • NLIS (1)
    • no till (1)
    • non GMO plants (1)
    • north Australia (7)
    • north korea (1)
    • northern Australia (28)
    • Northern Territory (23)
    • Novacq (1)
    • NT (5)
    • NT flora (1)
    • NT mangoes (1)
    • NT plants (1)
    • nutella (1)
    • nuts (1)
    • ocean (1)
    • oceans (1)
    • oestrogen (1)
    • oil palm (4)
    • oldest rocks (1)
    • olive disease (1)
    • olive oil (1)
    • olives (1)
    • Olympics (1)
    • omega -3 oil (1)
    • on-line tools (1)
    • online agribusiness (1)
    • opium (1)
    • opium poppy (1)
    • orange poinciana (1)
    • Ord (3)
    • organic (20)
    • organic beef (2)
    • organic fertiliser (1)
    • organic matter (7)
    • organic milk (1)
    • Oriental fruit fly (1)
    • ornamental horticulture (6)
    • oxygation (1)
    • P (1)
    • P750 (1)
    • palm diseases (1)
    • Palmerston NT (1)
    • palms (2)
    • Panama disease (3)
    • Panasonic (1)
    • paper (1)
    • pastoral industry (17)
    • pasture fed cattle (1)
    • pasture growth (1)
    • pasture growth start (1)
    • pastures (12)
    • PBR (1)
    • PCAS (1)
    • PCR (1)
    • peanuts (1)
    • pearl grass (1)
    • Perth (1)
    • pesticides (4)
    • phenoxy herbicides (1)
    • Philippines (1)
    • phosphorus (1)
    • phosphorus starvation tolerance gene (1)
    • photosynthesis (1)
    • phytomining (1)
    • phytoremediation (3)
    • pig (1)
    • plane (1)
    • planning (1)
    • plant biosecurity (4)
    • plant breeding (14)
    • plant disease (17)
    • plant genetic resources (1)
    • plant growth (1)
    • plant maths (1)
    • plant microbionome (1)
    • plant nutrition (17)
    • plant physiology (1)
    • plant varieties (2)
    • plant virus (1)
    • plants (12)
    • plastic waste (1)
    • plastics (1)
    • platinum (1)
    • playing field (1)
    • plum (1)
    • poinciana (1)
    • policy (1)
    • politics (2)
    • polystyrene (1)
    • Pope Francis (1)
    • poppy (1)
    • population (1)
    • potash (2)
    • potassium (2)
    • potato (2)
    • potatoes (1)
    • poultry disease (1)
    • prawns (1)
    • precision agriculture (2)
    • precision pastoral (1)
    • precision pastoralism (1)
    • probiotics (1)
    • protected cropping (1)
    • public defecation (1)
    • pulses (1)
    • pumping (1)
    • PV panels (1)
    • PV systems (3)
    • Pyongyang (1)
    • pyrethrin (1)
    • pyrolysis (1)
    • pyrolysis. soil carbon (1)
    • quadricopter (1)
    • quality (1)
    • quality food (1)
    • quality grain (1)
    • quarantine (8)
    • Queen garnet plum (1)
    • Queensland (2)
    • quinclorac (1)
    • quinoa (1)
    • r and d (2)
    • rabies (2)
    • rain (9)
    • rainfall (2)
    • Rainstop (1)
    • rainwater (1)
    • rainwater harvesting (5)
    • rainy season (1)
    • rank grass (1)
    • rat eradication (1)
    • recyclable paper cups (1)
    • recycling (24)
    • recycling nutrients (1)
    • recycling solar panels (2)
    • red meat (6)
    • red poinciana (1)
    • regulations (1)
    • remote sensing (2)
    • remotely piloted aircraft (2)
    • renewable energy (16)
    • renewables (2)
    • resources (3)
    • RFID (1)
    • rhizosphere (1)
    • rice (6)
    • Rinorea (1)
    • RNA technology (1)
    • roads (2)
    • roadside verge mowing (1)
    • robotics (1)
    • robots (1)
    • root organisms (1)
    • Roundup (1)
    • rum (1)
    • rural business (1)
    • rural development (34)
    • rural training (3)
    • sales (1)
    • salinity (4)
    • salt tolerance (5)
    • salvinia (1)
    • sand profile (1)
    • sandalwood (3)
    • sandalwood oil (1)
    • sanitation (5)
    • satellite imagery (2)
    • satellite tag (1)
    • science (1)
    • SE Asia (3)
    • sea (1)
    • sea urchins. (1)
    • sedge (1)
    • sediment (3)
    • sediment management (1)
    • seed (2)
    • seed priming (3)
    • seed sown zoysia (7)
    • seeded turf (6)
    • seeded zoysia (30)
    • seedling estabishment. turf (2)
    • seeds (3)
    • Seralini (1)
    • Sero-X (1)
    • sewerage (1)
    • shallow water (1)
    • shark (1)
    • sheep (1)
    • shipbuilding (1)
    • Silent Night song (1)
    • silent spring (1)
    • Simplot (1)
    • Sing (1)
    • Singapore (10)
    • slaughterhouse (1)
    • slow release fertiliser (2)
    • software (1)
    • soil (4)
    • soil biome (1)
    • soil carbon (18)
    • soil compaction (1)
    • soil conservation (2)
    • soil erosion (1)
    • soil health (2)
    • soil microbes (2)
    • soil moisture (1)
    • soil moisture measurement by drone (1)
    • soil pollution (1)
    • soils (36)
    • solar (1)
    • solar distillation (1)
    • solar electricity (7)
    • solar energy (23)
    • solar impulse (1)
    • solar panel (2)
    • solar panel end of life disposal (1)
    • solar panels as roads (1)
    • solar power (9)
    • solar water heating (2)
    • sorghum (1)
    • South America Brazil (8)
    • southern hemisphere (1)
    • sowing zoysia seed (1)
    • soybean (1)
    • sports oval (1)
    • spraying (4)
    • standing water (1)
    • steel (1)
    • stem rot palms (1)
    • sterile mosquitoes (1)
    • stormwater (5)
    • strawberries (1)
    • stunning (1)
    • styrofoam (2)
    • sugar (1)
    • sulfate (1)
    • sulfurous odours (1)
    • Sumba (1)
    • summer (1)
    • supermarkets (1)
    • sustainability (11)
    • sustainable (10)
    • sustainable agriculture (1)
    • sustainable intensification (1)
    • sustainable whiskey production (1)
    • Sydney Uni Agriculture Faculty (1)
    • System Rice Intensification (1)
    • take all (1)
    • take away coffee (1)
    • tall zoysia (1)
    • taste (1)
    • technology (5)
    • temperature (2)
    • Temple Grandin (1)
    • terra preta (1)
    • the Philippines (1)
    • thielaviopsis (1)
    • thorium (1)
    • tidal energy (1)
    • tidal power (1)
    • tillage (1)
    • toilets (8)
    • tomatoes (2)
    • Top End (1)
    • toshiba (1)
    • toxicity (1)
    • TR4 (3)
    • trade restrictions (1)
    • training (2)
    • transport corridor (1)
    • trawler (1)
    • trees (2)
    • trichoderma (1)
    • tropical agriculture (31)
    • tropical legumes (1)
    • tropical pastures (5)
    • tropical weather (1)
    • tropics (14)
    • trunk rot (1)
    • turf (16)
    • turf agronomy (1)
    • turf fertiliser (4)
    • turf management (37)
    • turf mowing (1)
    • turf seed (2)
    • turf seed sowing (1)
    • turf seed supply (2)
    • turf weeds (3)
    • types (1)
    • typhoon tree damage (1)
    • tyre recycling (1)
    • tyres in steel making (1)
    • UAV (5)
    • UAVs (1)
    • unmanned aircraft (2)
    • urban design (1)
    • urban horticulture (6)
    • urine (1)
    • USA (3)
    • USDA (1)
    • USEPA. Monsanto (1)
    • Value (1)
    • varieties (1)
    • variety improvement (1)
    • varroa mite (2)
    • vegetables (4)
    • versiwall (1)
    • Vietnam (1)
    • virus disease (2)
    • wagyu cattle (1)
    • wagyu oil (1)
    • Waite Institute (1)
    • warts (1)
    • waste (4)
    • waste management (34)
    • waste solar panels (1)
    • waste tyres (4)
    • wastewater (13)
    • water (44)
    • water buffalo (1)
    • water efficiency (1)
    • water management (1)
    • water pollution (1)
    • water purification (1)
    • water reuse (4)
    • water stress (1)
    • water treatment (13)
    • water use (3)
    • watering (2)
    • watersavr (1)
    • watersheds (1)
    • weather (20)
    • weed control (5)
    • weeds (19)
    • Western Australia (1)
    • wet season onset (1)
    • wheat (5)
    • wheat seed (1)
    • whiskey (1)
    • whitefly (1)
    • WHO (1)
    • wick wipe (1)
    • wind (2)
    • wind energy (8)
    • wind power (6)
    • wine (1)
    • winter (1)
    • Wolbachia (1)
    • woolcool (1)
    • Woolworths (1)
    • work (2)
    • work profile (2)
    • world record (1)
    • World Soils Day (1)
    • world toilet day (3)
    • world toilet day 2014 (1)
    • World Water Day (1)
    • world's hottest chilli (3)
    • world's tallest (2)
    • Wyndham (1)
    • Xeglyze (1)
    • XSTOL (1)
    • Xylella (1)
    • Yara (1)
    • Yara Australia (1)
    • yield (1)
    • you tube (1)
    • Zenith (2)
    • zenith zoysia (11)
    • zenith zoysia seed (9)
    • zoysia (60)
    • zoysia fertiliser (1)
    • zoysia history Australia (1)
    • Zoysia japonca (1)
    • zoysia japonica (1)
    • zoysia matrella (3)
    • zoysia seed (3)
    • zoysia seed 2019 (1)
    • zoysia seed available (1)
    • zoysia seed sowing (1)
    • zoysia tenuifolia (1)
    • zoysia tuf (1)
    • zoysia turf (5)